Home of the San Francisco Chronicle

Subscribe to the weekend Chronicle

powered by
Ideabooks
Photos
Products
Ideabooks
Discussions
Professionals
Users
The very important first step to great design is to do what in architecture lingo is called a site analysis — an examination of how the existing structure or new build relates or will relate to its unique existing environmental conditions. These conditions include topography, access, solar and wind orientation, views, existing trees or streams, and neighboring properties.
by H. Keith Wagner Partnership
The site or building site is the geographical location of your property. Some sites might be as simple as a rectangle, while others can have many complex property lines, requiring a survey map for you to know where the property begins and ends.
by THOMAS KYLE: Landscape Designer
Topography refers to the surface shape and features of your property. Is your site sloped, stepped or flat? Are there large boulders or rock croppings? Is there a pond? Many sites have a combination of topographical elements. Choosing where to locate your house in relation to these elements can make a big difference in the construction cost of your home. While locating your house on a rocky slope might create a dramatic setting and take full advantage of sweeping views, the foundation design will be extremely expensive. (Here’s a cost-saving tip: Avoid large retaining walls.)
by Carolyn Chadwick  
Access is how you get to your house from the nearest road. If your house is on an average city street, this is pretty straightforward, and there are not a lot of options. On larger rural properties however, the distance your house is from the nearest street can make a huge difference in the construction cost.
by THOMAS KYLE: Landscape Designer
One access consideration is the length of the driveway, which is often dictated by the fire department, which requires a minimum width, turnouts for fire trucks and a turnaround at the end. Utilities are another aspect. If your driveway is a half mile long, you most likely will have to pay to have electrical, plumbing, gas, cable and water lines run that distance as well. There is nothing like having a private refuge with nothing around but nature; just make sure you don’t overlook the less obvious but important consideration of access.
by Perello Building Corporation
Views can create dramatic backdrops for a home — always take advantage of appropriate views. And know that the success of your project will depend not only on using beautiful vistas, but on blocking and avoiding unpleasant ones. Proper site design takes into consideration the neighboring property conditions and should provide privacy, safety and a sense of independence for your home.
by mark pinkerton - vi360 photography
If you are fortunate enough to have a site with an existing stream or grouping of trees, be aware of them, as they are great design elements and add a sense of nature and dynamism to any landscape. Development around trees, creeks or streams is highly regulated in some jurisdictions.

If you are looking to purchase a property that has a large dry creek running through it, be aware that there could be setbacks required, greatly reducing the buildable area of your property.
by David Johnston Architects
Understanding your homesite, and properly locating and orienting your building, is the first step to great design.

Tell us: Have a question about site design, or have you had a good or bad site experience? Share it in the Comments below.
by Matthew Cunningham Landscape Design LLC

Comments

jehaller refreshing look at home design! thanks
4 months ago · ·
alwaysdesigning A good article. I am married to a residential architect and we are building our second custom designed house. Our first custom house on 3 acres was wonderful, but a ballpark with bright lights, and a new sanitary landfill sprang up on the other side of a greenspace near us. Now our next house will be on 26 acres with a pond.

I will add that it is important, along with the items you mentioned, to view the lot in wet weather for water runoff or pooling tendencies, at night for stray lights like football stadiums or ballpark lighting, and on weekends for area noise levels that may concern you, like ballfields you can't see or a racetrack you can hear that's miles away, or children racing around on 4wheelers. Also inquire with the local planning and zoning for any future plans that may impact your site in future years. We had the luxury of observing this acreage for a year of seasons and observation before choosing our build spot on it, and then our builder advised us to move the spot higher on the hill and we like it much better now. We start building next month.
4 months ago · ·
aekbranding Interesting post. Highlights the value of an architect's expertise in situating a home on one's site.

The 10,000 sq. ft. site of my future home was challenged by an incline toward an adjoining gully, and being a corner lot dotted with fruit trees I wanted to preserve.

My architect was able to save the 25 year old mango, cherry, golden apple and avocado trees planted by my late grandfather by working the short driveway around them, then situating the rooms so the lower level living area could benefit from their shade and upper level bedrooms would feel like tree houses. In this way I think he really made the most of the site while meeting my needs.
4 months ago · ·
archibong This is very educating. Makes lots of sense.
4 months ago · ·
maddeleaf In my experience most architects do not think much about the site, and your best bet is to get a landscape architect on board before the architect to conduct the site analysis and suggest building location and orientation.
2 months ago · ·
Lisa Roll Problem we are having is the house being built next to ours (been here 2 years and have an amazing view of the Texas Hill Country out back) was designed such that we view it easily from our back patio! Our builder and landscape designer are going to install a large berm with trees/plants to block this hideous view! Shouldn't the designer of that house taken this in account?
2 months ago ·
Kokopelli Builders, Inc I just published a blog this week on my own web site about this subject. You are spot on. We covered the same points. I'm a builder and I find it amazing how potential homeowners buy lots with only view in mind. Not thinking about the cost to get the other things they want in their home. Good article.
2 months ago · ·
Kristen Humphrey A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS WHAT YOU NEED! :o)

An architect is NOT the best professional to address the issues of site design. Generally they are grossly under qualified in this area as, understandably, their training focuses on the creation of buildings, not the land on which, or environment in which, they are located. Having said that, many architects will tell you they are qualified and will minimize the value of involving a landscape architect in the project. They may even try to tell you that they are saving you money. This is an erroneous and potentially very costly mistake.

Not only will a landscape architect consider the grading, drainage, types of soils on which you are building, but will site the house to take advantage of the best views and even more importantly, in an era of energy conservation, orientation of the sun, shade and prevailing winds to capitalize on heat in the winter and coolness in the summer. Similarly they will identify trees and other plant material existing on site which should be preserved and develop planting plans re: plant materials to be added which will add to the aesthetics, environmental health of the site (and contribute to the health of the larger region) and, again, contribute to the energy efficiency of your new home.

Bottom line: make sure you include the right professionals in your project, avoid costly mistakes, and enjoy the results of a better project to boot!
2 months ago · ·
heather DiPetrillo Wow! I wish I had this advice prior to spending thousands on plans that weren't within my budget. Three large retaining walls for a landscape plan.....big miscalculation.
2 months ago ·
Kokopelli Builders, Inc I have seen two suggestions involving landscape architects. And while they should be part of the input, I wouldn't put out broad statements of the inability of an architect to help in site analysis. Actually some are very good at this. The article addressed several issues and it takes a team to cover them all. I'm a builder, and I am very good at siting homes and reducing the cost of building. I also have a landscape architect background through my fathers business. But I have my limitations. On some lots, it takes a structural engineer to properly build the foundation and find the least cost method. And I and most architects and landscape architects don't have that expertise. So, I suggest a team approach before you buy your lot. It will spare you some unexpected cost later on. And any of the professionals mentioned, including a builder can find the right team to provide input.
2 months ago · ·
sefac Definitely get a landscape architect on board at the beginning. F.L. Wright insisted that you need a minimum of 1/2 acre. The most difficult aspect of home building is to make it look like it blends into the landscape. To make it look like it belongs there, no matter the architectural style.
2 months ago · ·
ralph1905 If your architect isn't considering the site sufficiently, get another architect!!!
2 months ago · ·
maggiesmom91 How do you go about finding a landscape architect? We "lucked' in to a wonderful piece of land...over an acre of waterfront property on a high cliff overlooking a bay. We have picked out house plans we like, but I'm not sure if it's 'right' for this million dollar property. Even though my son is a builder, he hasn't had much experience in designing houses of that calibre. I'm so afraid we will botch the whole thing if we don't get help on this one.
Any suggestions from someone in Newfoundland?
2 months ago ·
heather DiPetrillo I did use a landscape architect. I may have chosen a firm that specializes in a style that isn't appropriate for the property given the budget.
2 months ago · ·
carlajene Most of these comments make the assumption that one can afford the services of a number of professionals. Some of us would not have been able to have our own roof over our heads if we couldn't figure some things out for ourselves. I'm sure all those professionals have a lot to offer, but we all don't live in that "world". We currently live in the warm, solid, cozy, convenient, and attractive home that my mom and dad designed and built in the 70s, doing nearly all the labor themselves. Even the gorgeous fireplace, and some of the outdoor planters and the small retaining wall, are built with rock Dad packed down off the hill on his back. Dad did not finish high school, but he knew how to use his head and his hands. Over the years he replaced the windows with newer more efficient ones, added an automatic garage door opener, and made further updates. The house continues to meet code, if we should sell it in this more restrictive age.
Regarding the house built on a "dry creek bed", if you have that sort of property, be aware that in certain weather conditions that creek bed may not be "dry". It could be the favored avenue of spring runoff.
2 months ago · ·
c2blum I strongly echo the Southern (solar) exposure for energy efficiency fossil fuel pollution reasons if the view is not towards a dump. Otherwise, East facing fronts are good feng shui.
2 months ago · ·
sefac For those who want further information on residential construction along with site planning should consult "Architectural Graphic Standards for Residential Construction" authored by The American Institute of Architects. Published by John Wiley & Sons. The book, 505 pages, contains a wealth of information concerning all aspects of residential construction. New and used copies of this work are readily available.
2 months ago ·
Laurel Ennis I think they're crazy to build so close to a creek, especially in Colorado which is known for it's canyon floods. Move to high ground.
2 months ago ·
nozyani "Avoid retaining walls?" What's the other option
2 months ago ·
Mark Wilson, ASLA As for landscape architectural design, I am a landscape architect, and very biased. Everything in this article describes the scope of what a landscape architect does on every project, whether residential, commercial, institutional, whatever. However, the best projects I've had the priviledge of working have come about in collaboration with an architect. Architects are trained in college in the same set of design skills as a landscape architect. As an architect, the curriculum typically covers about 2 courses of site design, while landscape architectural curriculum covers about the same in architecture. Point is, the gentleman writing for Kokopelli Builders had it right...a design team approach is always best. We typically provide grading design to minimize cuts / fills / disturbed area. But am currently on a project in which the site was so steep that the minimal disturbance scheme involved a balance of retaining walls uphill, and a foundation wall on the downhill side of the home. Problem: the foundation wall cost is 4 times the cost of the retaining walls. Result, the finished floor elevations were dropped 4 feet, creating taller retaining walls uphill, and less foundation wall downhill. The benefit to our client in cost savings would not have come about with out close collaboration between landscape architect, architect, and builder. The biggest implication of architect versus landscape architect seems to be the design process of each. An architect will typically lay out a site plan considering all of the above article, but in a very generic manner, leaving critical decisions undetailed during pricing phases with the intention of detailing during construction. This is a typical residential methodology that has worked for a very long time. But on a large site, that method will leave large gaps unexplained to the contractor resulting in $$$Change Orders$$$. A landscape architect consultant (not necessarily design-build) will detail all those previously unexplained critical decisions in collaboration with the architect, thereby bringing to the light of day the realistic cost of the project that previously was only a "place-holder" budget item. In addition, since the LA is a specialist, greater design opportunities are also explored, benefiting the project and owner as a whole.
2 months ago · ·
Kristen Humphrey An outstanding explanation of the ideal: a collaborative effort. Kudos to Mr. Wilson for such a thoughtful, thorough real-world description of how the two disciplines should complement each other and better yet how the client can benefit from the expertise each. I stand (very happily) corrected on my original assertion, which I wholly admit was biased in response to the original article which detailed the "job" of a landscape architect but attributed it solely to an architect.
2 months ago ·
Mark Wilson, ASLA @sefac...Architectural Graphic Standards is a great, traditional text. For detailed information about landscape architectural design process , two books can not be beat... http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/10766965-residential-landscape-architecture, Residential Landscape Architecture: Design Process for the Private Residence,
and from my college days... http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1804855.Basic_Elements_of_Landscape_Architectural_Design, Basic Elements of Landscape Architectural Design. Each are authored by Norman Booth, Professor Emeritus at Ohio State. http://www.linkedin.com/in/normanbooth
2 months ago ·
Heffner Design Team, PLLC Go the American Society of Landscape Architects to find a landscape architect near you. http://www.asla.org/ISGWeb.aspx?loadURL=firfin
2 months ago · ·
nedusome Simply inspiring.
A home cannot exist without the environment, just as fish
Without water!
2 months ago ·
CAROLE MEYER Very educational piece. Thanks.
2 months ago ·
ohonestly I bought a house that has site issues. It's built below two converging hills that form a 'V' at my property left back rectangular corner. I have had my basement flood out twice even with a sump pump, due to a high water table. I had to dig a 12 inch by 12 inch ditch the whole 85 foot length of the side property line to drain the water (see Photo) that funnels into my yard at every rain storm.. The property is inclined looking out the back, from left (high) to right and consists of clay soil. With having limited financial resources; I don't know where to go beyond here. Any ideas?
2 months ago · ·
nozyani Mark Wilson, thank you for your detailed explanation. We had the same problems on a slope lot and attached are pictures showing a stone wall which was not in the original plans. Are we on the right track?
2 months ago ·
Mark Wilson, ASLA @ohonestly - research your region through your state's erosion control or stormwater ordinances...local city or county erosion control personnel should be helpful to point you in the right direction. What you need to calculate is first, off-site watershed draining through your property. Secondly, calculate the amount of storm water run-off generated by the watershed. Third, use the storm water run-off volume to calculate the size swale required (depth x width dimensions and side slope) to carry the design storm. Repeat, utilize local public agency folks who are there to help you. Last, don't just settle for a ditch. Try creating a feature like the "dry creek" swale that I created at my house (image below). That swale carries a large amount of run-off above my house, and left like the builder had created, it would have been a permanent quagmire. Turn that problem into a design opportunity:)

@nozyani - not enough information to tell. contact a local landscape architect for site design, but honestly, looks like a problem that should have been solved on paper before it became a construction issue...that's what design professionals are good at.
2 months ago ·
nozyani Thanks for your prompt reply. Will do as advised
2 months ago ·
Dylan Chappell Architects Hi Everyone,

Thanks for all the great comments and questions. I echo Mark's guidance on establishing the right team early on in the design process. It's been my experience that assembling the right team from the start, has proven to be the single most successful decision you can make as a homeowner. We highly value the landscape architects we collaborate with as well as our team of contractors. This article was never intended to insinuate having your architect take the place of a landscape architect, but rather help homeowners or potential property owners be aware of a few issues that can effect the outcome of their projects.
2 months ago ·
ohonestly to Mark Wilson - Thank you for your response. It looks like a great plan to start with. Life is full of many "ohonestly" situations and this is definitely one that has caused many sleepless nights.
Ken - 'Ohonestly'
2 months ago ·
amandamoore We own 22 acres that is currently agriculture zoned and is at the highest point in the county. We want to downsize from 2800 sqft in the burbs to 1800 sqft on our rural land. We are reviewing plans and are ready to search for builders - am I skipping a step? Should we first get estimates for the utilities? We will have to run them along an easement through our neighbors 10 ac property - where do I start? Our desired budget is 250k for the project (house, basement, utilities, driveway, whatever else). I know an architect charges around 20% of the project so we are electing to pick a plan instead, what does a landscape architect run?
2 months ago ·
Mark Wilson, ASLA First, I'd suggest shopping for architects. Seek referrals from friends and family. The internet is a wonderful resource through the AIA website to locate architects near you. Their expertise brought to bear to build a home that's exactly what you want is worth the expenditure. Compare "exactly what you want" to a plan book that's a designers best effort at providing what the widest audience possible may want. How much is that worth? The architect can help you plan where to put the home to maximize passive energy gains and savings, views, and all while minimizing grading and building costs. If necessary, the architect may recommend a landscape architect should the site issues be more than they care to take on, or if they feel the architectural program is all they care to tackle (see my above comments regarding architect and LA collaboration). My wife and I are working with an architect for an expansion of our home for an enlarged MBR and MBA. We are very pleased with the results, the cost was much more affordable that we thought, and we suspect that the cost of the fees are being paid by project cost savings through careful planning...exactly what you are seeking. Doesn't cost anything but time to interview one or two, with the potential of saving mistakes you'll look at for a long time. Last the architect is your ally during the building process and will be your advocate in conversations with the builder and your translator to help interpret what implications for various choices. Best of Luck, Mark
2 months ago · ·
Sign Up to comment
People found the photos in this ideabook after searching for:
The content on this page is provided by Houzz and is subject to the Houzz terms of use, copyright and privacy policy.
Copyright claims: contact the Houzz designated agent.